In Re Stanley J. Solomon, Debtor. E. Hanlin Bavely v. Stanley Jay Solomon

Sixth Circuit

In Re Stanley J. Solomon, Debtor. E. Hanlin Bavely v. Stanley Jay Solomon

37 F.3d 1499, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35067, 1994 WL 562060

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 13, 1994·No. 93-3775·Published

Opinion

37 F.3d 1499
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

In re Stanley J. SOLOMON, Debtor.
E. Hanlin BAVELY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Stanley Jay SOLOMON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-3775.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 13, 1994.

Before: MILBURN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1499
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

In re Stanley J. SOLOMON, Debtor.
E. Hanlin BAVELY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Stanley Jay SOLOMON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-3775.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 13, 1994.

Before: MILBURN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

In Re Stanley J. Solomon, Debtor. E. Hanlin Bavely v. Stanley Jay Solomon, 37 F.3d 1499, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35067, 1994 WL 562060 (6th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

37 F.3d 1499 (In Re Stanley J. Solomon, Debtor. E. Hanlin Bavely v. Stanley Jay Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.