in Re Stanley Hall
This text of in Re Stanley Hall (in Re Stanley Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00449-CR
IN RE Stanley HALL
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 23, 2008
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 20, 2008, relator Stanley Hall, acting pro se, filed two mandamus petitions in this
court. The issues presented in these petitions involve relator’s pending criminal cases wherein relator
is represented by trial counsel. We are of the opinion relator’s trial counsel is also relator’s counsel
for an original proceeding on the issues presented. Relator has no right to hybrid representation.
See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid
representation means relator’s pro se petitions will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s
review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petitions are denied.
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2000-CR-1626A and 2000-CR-1627A, styled State of Texas v. Stanley Hall, pending in the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, the Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Stanley Hall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stanley-hall-texapp-2008.