In Re Stanley

982 A.2d 1146, 2009 WL 3460099
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 2009·No. 09-BG-1209·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of petitioner, Denise R. Stanley’s petition for reinstatement, this court’s opinion in In re Stanley, 769 A.2d 141 (D.C.2001) indefinitely suspending petitioner from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, the Court of Appeals of Maryland’s order of reinstatement, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Denise R. Stanley, 385 Md. 319, 869 A.2d 750 (2005), and the statement of Bar Counsel concluding that petitioner is fit to resume the practice of law in the District of Columbia, and it further appearing that petitioner has filed the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that petitioner, Denise R. Stanley, be and hereby is reinstated to practice law in the District of Columbia. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that prior to practicing law in the District of Columbia, petitioner shall complete the mandatory course on the D.C. Rules on Professional Conduct and District of Columbia Practice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Stanley, 982 A.2d 1146, 2009 WL 3460099 (D.C. 2009).

982 A.2d 1146 (In Re Stanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Mir
982 A.2d 1146 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)