In re Stanford

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Stanford

273 So. 3d 300

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 28, 2019

DocketNO. 2019-B-0626

StatusPublished

This text of 273 So. 3d 300 (In re Stanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Stanford, 273 So. 3d 300 (La. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Respondent was convicted of conspiracy to introduce and cause to be introduced misbranded drugs into interstate commerce, money-laundering conspiracy, and money laundering. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that his conduct constitutes a violation of Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Daniel James Stanford, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22639, be and he hereby is disbarred, retroactive to September 17, 2014, the date of his interim suspension. His name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys and his license to practice law in the State of Louisiana shall be revoked.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Respondent was convicted of conspiracy to introduce and cause to be introduced misbranded drugs into interstate commerce, money-laundering conspiracy, and money laundering. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that his conduct constitutes a violation of Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Daniel James Stanford, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22639, be and he hereby is disbarred, retroactive to September 17, 2014, the date of his interim suspension. His name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys and his license to practice law in the State of Louisiana shall be revoked.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 So. 3d 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stanford-la-2019.