In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—INSTRUCTION 29.24

200 So. 3d 754, 2016 WL 4916757
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 15, 2016
DocketSC16-1440
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 200 So. 3d 754 (In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—INSTRUCTION 29.24) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—INSTRUCTION 29.24, 200 So. 3d 754, 2016 WL 4916757 (Fla. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee) has submitted proposed changes to standard jury instruction 29.24 (Human Trafficking), and asks that the Court authorize the amended standard instruction for publication and use. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

Previously, under case number SC16-1430, the Committee submitted its report requesting that the Court authorize for publication and use numerous standard criminal jury instructions, including instruction 29.24. Because the proposed amendments to the Human Trafficking instruction were based upon 2016 legislative changes to section 787.06, Florida Statutes, the Committee was directed to file a separate report including only its proposed amendments to instruction 29.24, to be reviewed pursuant to the Court’s fast-track procedures in order to expedite consideration of the proposal. See In re Std. Jury Instrs. in Crim. Cases — Report 2016-07, No. SC16-1430 (Order) (Fla. Aug. 10, 2016); cf. In re Std. Jury Instrs. in Crim. Cases — Instrs. 9.1 and 9.2, 156 So.3d 495, 495 n. 1 (Fla.2015).

The Committee previously published its proposal in The Florida Bar News. No comments were received pertaining to instruction 29.24.

The more significant changes to instruction 29.24 are discussed below. First, a “reclassification” section is added, based upon chapter 2016-24, section 3, Laws of Florida, which adds a new section 787.06(8), Florida Statutes, to reclassify second-degree Human Trafficking to a first-degree felony and first-degree Human Trafficking to a life felony, if the defendant causes great bodily harm, permanent disfigurement, or permanent disability to another during the commission of the crime. The amendment to the instruction requires the jury to make that later finding if it found the defendant guilty of Human Trafficking. Second, a “lack of chastity is not a defense” section is added based upon chapter 2016-199, section 4, Laws of Florida, which adds a new section 787.06(10) to provide a victim’s lack of chastity or the willingness or consent of a victim is not a defense to prosecution under section 787.06 if the victim was under the age of 18 at the time of the offense.

Having considered the Committee’s report and reviewing the relevant legislation, we authorize the amendments as proposed by the Committee. Accordingly, instruction 29.24 is authorized for publication and use as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. 1 New language is indicated by *755 underlining, and deleted language is indicated by struck-through type. In authorizing the publication and use of instruction 29.24, we express no opinion on its correctness and remind all interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or alternative instructions nor contesting the legal correctness of the instruction. .We further caution all interested parties that any comments associated with the instruction reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily indicative of the views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. The instruction as set forth in the appendix shall become effective on October 1, 2016, at 12:01 a.m. 2

It is so ordered.

. LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

29.24 HUMAN TRAFFICKING

§ 787.06(3), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Human Trafficking, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Defendant) knowingly, or in reckless disregard of the facts, [engaged in] [attempted to engage in] [benefited financially by receiving something of value from participation in a venture that subjected a person to] human trafficking.
Give as applicable
2. § 787,06(3) (a) 1, Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking was for the labor or services of a child.
§ 787.06(3) (a)2, Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking involved (defendant’s) use of coercion for the labor or services of an adult.
§ 787,06(3)(b), Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking involved (defendant’s) use of coercion for commercial sexual activity of an adult.
§ 787.06(3)(c)l, Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking was for the labor or services of a child who was an unauthorized alien.
§ 787.06(3)(c)2, Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking involved (defendant’s) use of coercion for the labor or services of an adult who was an unauthorized alien.
§ 787.06(3) (d), Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking involved (defendant’s) use of coercion for commercial sexual activity of an adult who was an unauthorized alien.
§ 787.06(3)(e)l, Fla, Stat.
The human trafficking was for the labor or services of a child by the transfer or . transport of the child from outside Florida to within this state.
§ 787.06(3)(e)2, Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking involved (defendant’s) use of coercion for the labor or services of an adult by the transfer or transport of the adult *756 from outside Florida to within this state.
§ 787.06(3)01, Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking was for commercial sexual activity of a child by the transfer or transport of the child from outside Florida to within this state.
§ 787.06(3)02, Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking involved (defendant’s) use of coercion for commercial sexual activity of an adult by the transfer or transport of the adult from outside Florida to within this state.
§ 787.06(3)(g), Fla. Stat.
The human trafficking was for commercial sexual activity in which a [child] [person who is mentally defective or mentally incapacitated] was involved.

Reclassification. § 787.06(8), Fla, Stat. Give jf applicable.

If you found (defendant) guilty of Human Trafficking, you must further determine whether the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that during the commission of the Human Trafficking, [he] [she] caused [great bodily harm] [or] [permanent disability] [or] [permanent disfigurement to [another person] [ (victim) ].

Definitions.

Give in all cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-14.
267 So. 3d 980 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2019)
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2016-07.
242 So. 3d 327 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 So. 3d 754, 2016 WL 4916757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-standard-jury-instructions-in-criminal-casesinstruction-2924-fla-2016.