In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-11

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2020
DocketSC19-1806
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-11 (In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-11) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-11, (Fla. 2020).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC19-1806 ____________

IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES— REPORT 2019-11.

February 27, 2020

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal

Cases (Committee) has submitted proposed changes to the standard jury

instructions and asks that the Court authorize the amended standard instructions for

publication and use. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Committee proposes amending instructions 3.12 (Verdict), 8.26 (Sexual

Cyberharassment), 11.21 (Transmission of Material Harmful to Minors by

Electronic Device or Equipment), and 27.1 ([Attempted] Escape). The Committee

published the proposals in The Florida Bar News. One comment was received,

from the Florida Public Defender Association (FPDA), pertaining to three of the four above-listed instructions.1 The Court did not publish the proposals.

Having considered the Committee’s report and the FPDA’s comment, we

authorize the Committee’s proposals to the instructions herein at issue for

publication and use. Some of the more significant changes to the instructions are

discussed below.

Instruction 3.12 is amended to remove the reference to “information” and

“indictment” while retaining language that the jury may find the defendant guilty

as charged or of a lesser-included crime. In addition, the instruction is amended to

provide that if the case involves one or more lesser-included offenses, the second

paragraph, stating, “If you return a verdict of guilty, it should be for the highest

offense on the verdict form [for each count] that has been proven beyond a

reasonable doubt. If you find that no offense has been proven beyond a reasonable

doubt, then, of course, your verdict must be not guilty,” should be given.

Instruction 8.26 is amended to reflect that the offense of sexual

cyberharassment may be committed by “dissemination” of a sexually explicit

image of the victim through electronic means, and that the publication or

dissemination was contrary to the victim’s reasonable expectation of privacy. The

instruction is further amended to include the definition of “personal identification

1. Two of the FPDA’s suggested changes to two of the instructions, as proposed, were technical.

-2- information” as provided by section 784.049(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2019), and a

citation to section 784.049(2)(c) is included for “reasonable expectation of

privacy.”

Instruction 27.1 is rewritten to reorganize the elements and also includes

“released on furlough” in accord with an amendment to section 944.40, Florida

Statutes (2019), by chapter 2019-167, section 54, Laws of Florida.

The amended criminal jury instructions, as set forth in the appendix to this

opinion, are hereby authorized for publication and use. 2 New language is indicated

by underlining, and deleted language is indicated by struck-through type. We

caution all interested parties that any comments associated with the instructions

reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily indicative of the

views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. In authorizing the

publication and use of these instructions, we express no opinion on their

correctness and remind all interested parties that this authorization forecloses

neither requesting additional or alternative instructions nor contesting the legal

2. The amendments as reflected in the appendix are to the Criminal Jury Instructions as they appear on the Court’s website at www.floridasupremecourt.org/jury_instructions/instructions.shtml. We recognize that there may be minor discrepancies between the instructions as they appear on the website and the published versions of the instructions. Any discrepancies as to instructions authorized for publication and use after October 25, 2007, should be resolved by reference to the published opinion of this Court authorizing the instruction.

-3- correctness of the instructions. The instructions as set forth in the appendix shall

become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

Original Proceeding – Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases

Judge F. Rand Wallis, Chair, Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, Daytona Beach, Florida; and Bart Schneider, Staff Liaison, Office of the State Courts Administrator, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-4- APPENDIX

3.12 VERDICT

You may find the defendant guilty as charged in the [information] [indictment] [or guilty of such lesser included crime[s] as the evidence may justify] or not guilty.

*[If you return a verdict of guilty, it should be for the highest offense on the verdict form [for each count] that has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If you find that no offense has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then, of course, your verdict must be not guilty.]

The verdict must be unanimous, that is, all of you must agree to the same verdict. Only one verdict may be returned as to [the crime] [each crime] charged [, except as to Count (insert number), where the defendant can be found guilty of more than one lesser included crime]. The verdict must be in writing and for your convenience the necessary verdict form[s] [has] [have] been prepared for you. [It is] [They are] as follows (read verdict form(s)):

Give if State is proceeding on both theories of First Degree Murder (premeditated and felony murder). Mansfield v. State, 911 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 2005). If you return a verdict of guilty to the charge of First Degree Murder, it is not necessary that all of you agree the State proved First Degree Premeditated Murder and it is not necessary that all of you agree the State proved First Degree Felony Murder. Instead, what is required is that all of you agree the State proved either First Degree Premeditated Murder or First Degree Felony Murder.

In cases of multiple defendants or multiple charges, give 3.12(a), (b), or (c) as applicable.

A sample of possible verdict forms for typical variables in combinations of defendants and charges follows:

1. Verdict form for single count, single defendant. We, the jury, find as follows, as to the defendant in this case: (check only one)

-5- ___a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). ___b. The defendant is guilty of (a lesser included offense). ___c. The defendant is not guilty.

2. Verdict form for multiple counts, single defendant.

We, the jury, find as follows, as to Count I of the charge: (check only one as to this count) ___a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). ___b. The defendant is guilty of (a lesser included offense). ___c. The defendant is not guilty. We, the jury, find as follows, as to Count II of the charge: (check only one as to this count) ___a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). ___b. The defendant is guilty of (a lesser included offense). ___c. The defendant is not guilty.

3. Verdict form if a count is a crime where the defendant can be guilty of more than one lesser included offense. We, the jury, find as follows, as to Count (insert number) of the charge: ___a. The defendant is guilty of (crime charged). (If the defendant is not guilty of the main charge, then proceed to the lesser included offenses): ___b.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Jury Inst. in Cr. Cases No. 2006-2
962 So. 2d 310 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
State v. Harbaugh
754 So. 2d 691 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Sanders v. State
944 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Seese v. State
955 So. 2d 1145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Kearse v. State
662 So. 2d 677 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Gian-Grasso v. State
899 So. 2d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Applewhite v. State
874 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Mansfield v. State
911 So. 2d 1160 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2016-02
199 So. 3d 234 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-09.
238 So. 3d 192 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-08.
244 So. 3d 157 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-04.
257 So. 3d 370 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
Lakey v. State
113 So. 3d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Lawson v. State
312 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Marquez v. State
450 So. 2d 345 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Patterson v. State
512 So. 2d 1109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-standard-jury-instructions-in-criminal-cases-report-2019-11-fla-2020.