In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-03

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 2020
DocketSC19-470
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-03 (In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-03) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-03, (Fla. 2020).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC19-470 ____________

IN RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES— REPORT 2019-03.

February 6, 2020

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal

Cases (Committee) has submitted proposed changes to the standard jury

instructions and asks that the Court authorize the amended standard instructions.

We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Committee filed a report proposing amendments to existing standard

criminal jury instruction 25.13(f) ([Ownership] [Lease] [Rental] of a Place for

[[Trafficking in] [Sale of] a Controlled Substance] [Manufacturing a Controlled

Substance Intended for Sale or Distribution]), and new standard criminal jury

instructions 25.13(g) (Possession of a Place for [[Trafficking in] [Sale of] a

Controlled Substance] [Manufacturing a Controlled Substance Intended for Sale or

Distribution]) and 25.13(h) (Possession of a Place Used to Manufacture a Controlled Substance Intended for Sale or Distribution (Minor Present or in

Residence)). Previously, the Committee published the proposals in The Florida

Bar News; no comments were received by the Committee. We authorize for

publication and use instruction 25.13(f) as amended by the Committee, and new

instructions 25.13(g) and 25.13(h) with the modification discussed below.

New instructions 25.13(g) and 25.13(h) instruct upon the offenses codified

in section 893.1351, subsections (1) and (2), Florida Statutes (2019), respectively,

track the statutory language, and include relevant definitions. We modify the

Committee’s proposal to include the term “trailer” within the applicable elemental

and definitional portions of the instructions. The instructional language included

in each pertaining to “possession” is consistent with that previously authorized.

See In re Std. Jury Instrs. in Criminal Cases—Report 2017-03, 238 So. 3d 182, 183

(Fla. 2018). In addition to the elements and the definition portions of the

instructions, instruction 25.13(g) includes a comment reflecting that a special

instruction may be required to address the nexus between the “conveyance,”

“place,” “trailer,” or “structure,” and the drug activity, citing Hunt v. State, 256 So.

3d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018), and Delgado-George v. State, 125 So. 3d 1031 (Fla.

2d DCA 2013), and both instructions include a comment that a special instruction

will be required if the defense is that the defendant did not know of the illicit

nature of the controlled substance, citing section 893.101, Florida Statutes.

-2- Having considered the Committee’s report, we authorize for publication and

use existing instruction 25.13(f) as proposed and new instructions 25.13(g) and

25.13(h) as modified, and as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. 1 New

language is indicated by underlining. In authorizing the publication and use of

these instructions, we express no opinion on their correctness and remind all

interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or

alternative instructions nor contesting the legal correctness of the instructions. We

further caution all interested parties that any comments associated with the

instructions reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily

indicative of the views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. The

instructions as set forth in the appendix shall be effective when this opinion

becomes final.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.

1. The amendments as reflected in the appendix are to the Criminal Jury Instructions as they appear on the Court’s website at https://jury.flcourts.org. We recognize that there may be minor discrepancies between the instructions as they appear on the website and the published versions of the instructions. Any discrepancies as to instructions authorized for publication and use after October 25, 2007, should be resolved by reference to the published opinion of this Court authorizing the instruction.

-3- Original Proceeding – Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases

Judge F. Rand Wallis, Chair, Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, Daytona Beach, Florida; and Bart Schneider, Staff Liaison, Office of the State Courts Administrator, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-4- APPENDIX

25.13(f) [OWNERSHIP] [LEASE] [RENTAL] OF A PLACE FOR [[TRAFFICKING IN] [SALE OF] A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE] [MANUFACTURING A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE INTENDED FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION] § 893.1351(1), Fla. Stat.

Certain drugs and chemical substances are by law known as “controlled substances.” (Insert name(s) of controlled substance(s)) [is a] [are] controlled substance[s].

To prove the crime of [Ownership] [Lease] [Rental] of a Place for [[Trafficking in] [Sale of] a Controlled Substance] [Manufacturing a Controlled Substance Intended for Sale or Distribution], the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Defendant) [owned] [leased] [rented] any [place] [structure [or part thereof]] [conveyance].

2. At that time, (defendant) knew the [place] [structure [or part thereof]] [conveyance] would be used for the purpose of [Trafficking in (insert name(s) of controlled substance)] [Sale of a Controlled Substance] [Manufacture of a Controlled Substance that was intended for sale or distribution to another].

Inference. Give if applicable. § 893.1351(4), Fla. Stat. You may conclude that cannabis was intended for sale or distribution upon proof of the possession of 25 or more cannabis plants.

§ 893.02(3), Fla. Stat. “Cannabis” means all parts of any plant of the genus Cannabis, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant or its seeds or resin.

Definitions. Give as applicable. § 810.011(1), Fla. Stat. Dubose v. State, 210 So. 3d 641 (Fla. 2017).

-5- A “structure” is any building of any kind, either temporary or permanent, which has a roof over it together with the curtilage. The “curtilage” is the enclosed land adjoining the structure. [The enclosure need not be continuous as it may have an ungated opening for entering and exiting.]

§ 810.011(3), Fla. Stat. A “conveyance” means any motor vehicle, ship, vessel, railroad vehicle or car, trailer, aircraft, or sleeping car.

Insert elements of Trafficking alleged, if applicable.

“Sell” means to transfer or deliver something to another person in exchange for money or something of value or a promise of money or something of value.

§ 893.02(15)(a), Fla. Stat. “Manufacture” means the production, preparation, propagation, compounding, cultivating, growing, conversion, or processing of a controlled substance, either directly or indirectly, by extraction from substances of natural origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, or by a combination of extraction and chemical synthesis, and includes any packaging of the substance or labeling or relabeling of its container.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bobby Lee Zeigler v. State of Florida
198 So. 3d 1005 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Rasheem Diquoine Dubose v. State of Florida
210 So. 3d 641 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-09.
238 So. 3d 192 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-03.
238 So. 3d 182 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
TRAVIS HUNT v. STATE OF FLORIDA
256 So. 3d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Delgado-George v. State
125 So. 3d 1031 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-03, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-standard-jury-instructions-in-criminal-cases-report-2019-03-fla-2020.