In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-06.

236 So. 3d 282
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 2018
DocketSC17-1740
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 236 So. 3d 282 (In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-06.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-06., 236 So. 3d 282 (Fla. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee) has submitted proposed changes to the standard jury instructions and asks that the Court authorize the amended standard instructions for publication and use. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

*283 The Committee's proposals derive from two referrals by the Court to the Committee. The first referral concerned instructions that pertain to section 782.065, Florida Statutes (2017), and was based upon Ramroop v. State , 214 So.3d 657 (Fla. 2017), in which we held that the State must prove that the defendant knew that the victim was a law enforcement officer (LEO), correctional officer, etc., for the reclassification of a murder or attempted murder charge. New instructions 6.7 (Attempted Murder-Reclassified) and 7.13 (Murder-Reclassified) were proposed in light of Ramroop . The second referral was based upon State v. Spencer , 216 So.3d 481 (Fla. 2017), in which we determined that fundamental error resulted where the instruction for Attempted Manslaughter by Act as read to the jury did not include an instruction on justifiable or excusable attempted homicide. In light of Spencer , the Committee proposed amendments to the following existing attempted homicide and homicide instructions: 6.2 (Attempted First Degree Premeditated Murder); 6.3 (Attempted Felony Murder); 6.3(a) (Attempted Felony Murder-Injury Caused by Another); 6.4 (Attempted Second Degree Murder); 6.6 (Attempted Manslaughter by Act); 7.2 (Murder-First Degree); 7.3 (Felony Murder-First Degree); 7.4 (Murder-Second Degree); 7.5 (Felony Murder-Second Degree); 7.6 (Felony Murder-Third Degree); 7.7 (Manslaughter); and 7.7(a) (Aggravated Manslaughter).

Following publication by the Committee, a comment was received from the Florida Public Defender Association (FPDA). The Court did not publish the proposals after they were filed. The Court authorizes instructions 6.2, 6.3, 6.3(a), 6.4, 6.6, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7(a), and 7.13 as proposed, and authorizes instruction 7.7 with modifications. The more significant amendments to the instructions are discussed below.

With regard to the attempted homicide and homicide-related instructions before the Court-6.2, 6.3, 6.3(a), 6.4, 6.6, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, and 7.7(a)-we recognize that in Spencer we held that fundamental error resulted when the defendant's jury was instructed upon attempted manslaughter by act, but the instruction omitted instructions upon justifiable and excusable attempted homicide. Id. , 216 So.3d at 486 . To remedy this situation, we amend the above listed instructions to include one of the applicable following italicized sentences at the top of all attempted murder and murder instructions:

In the absence of an express concession that the attempted homicide was not excusable or justified, the trial judge must also read Instruction 6.1, Introduction to Attempted Homicide.

or

In the absence of an express concession that the homicide was not excusable or justified, the trial judge must also read Instruction 7.1, Introduction to Homicide.

In addition, in the context of the attempted manslaughter and manslaughter instructions, the following italicized paragraph is added as a note to the trial judge:

It is fundamental error not to instruct on justifiable attempted homicide and excusable attempted homicide in the absence of an express concession that the attempted homicide was not excusable or justified. See State v. Spencer, 216 So.3d 481 (Fla. 2017).

Turning to the individual instructions, we further amend instruction 6.2 by deleting the section of the instruction pertaining to the enhanced penalty pursuant to section 782.065(2), Florida Statutes, as well as the paragraph in the Comments section *284 addressing the enhancement. Instead, a new paragraph is added to the Comments section referencing instruction 6.7 for the section 782.065 reclassification enhancement, in light of Ramroop .

Next, new instruction 6.7 pertains to the reclassification statute, section 782.065, Florida Statutes, and is based upon this Court's decision in Ramroop . In the opening portion of the instruction, an italicized note to the trial judge explains what is required for the reclassification:

In Ramroop v. State, 214 So.3d 657 (Fla. 2017), the Florida Supreme Court held that § 782.065(2), Fla. Stat. is a reclassification statute that creates a substantive offense. Accordingly, the trial judge should add the three elements below to the elements section of the appropriate Attempted Murder crime (See Instruction 6.2, 6.3, 6.3(a), or 6.4.)

Instruction 6.7 then includes the three elements that the jury must find for the reclassification, including that the victim was a law enforcement officer (LEO), etc., that the defendant knew the victim was an LEO, etc., and that the victim was engaged in the lawful performance of a legal duty.

Existing instruction 7.2 is further amended by deleting the paragraph pertaining to "transferred intent" and adding a sentence to the Comments section providing that instruction 3.6(o) be given if the case involves transferred intent. In addition, the section of the instruction pertaining to the enhanced penalty pursuant to section 782.065(2), i.e., the definitions relevant to the enhancement, is deleted, as is the paragraph in the Comments section addressing the enhancement, and a new sentence in the Comments section is added referring to instruction 7.13 for the section 782.065 reclassification.

Instructions 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 are further amended by deleting the section of the instruction pertaining to the enhanced penalty pursuant to section 782.065(2), as is the paragraph in the Comments section addressing the enhancement, and a new sentence in the Comments section is added referring to instruction 7.13 for the section 782.065 reclassification. The table of lesser included offenses in instruction 7.5 is also amended to delete the asterisk to Manslaughter as a Category One offense, in light of our decision in Dean v. State , 230 So.3d 420 (Fla. 2017), holding that manslaughter is a necessarily lesser included offense of second-degree felony murder.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 So. 3d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-standard-jury-instructions-in-criminal-cases-report-2017-06-fla-2018.