In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (No. 2005-6)

958 So. 2d 361, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 183, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 771, 2007 WL 1287506
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 3, 2007
DocketNo. SC05-1651
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 958 So. 2d 361 (In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (No. 2005-6)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (No. 2005-6), 958 So. 2d 361, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 183, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 771, 2007 WL 1287506 (Fla. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee) has submitted new instructions and proposed changes to the standard jury instructions in criminal cases. The Committee asks the Court to authorize for publication and use the amended standard instructions. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Committee proposes amendments to standard jury instructions 28.9, No Valid Driver’s License, and 28.11, Driving While License Suspended, Revoked or Canceled With Knowledge. The Committee also proposes two new standard jury instructions, 28.9(a), No Valid Commercial Driver’s License, and 28.11(a), Driving While License Revoked as a Habitual Traffic Offender. On September 15, 2005, the Committee filed its proposals, which are in response to (1) comments received by the Committee from members of The Florida Bar; and (2) changes in the statutes that require new or amended instructions.

The Court published the proposals for comments in the October 15, 2005, edition of The Florida Bar News. Comments were due by November 15, 2005. Two comments were timely filed with the Court. Prior to the comments being filed with the Court, on November 2, 2005, the Committee filed an amended instruction 28.11, Driving While License Suspended, Revoked, or Canceled With Knowledge, due to errors found. After the amendments were published, the Committee requested leave to file an amended instruction 28.11 and ultimately requested leave to file an amended report, which was granted.

We specifically note that the revised instructions, which include a moped within the definition for “motor vehicle,” make the instructions consistent with State v. Meister, 849 So.2d 1127 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). See also Verrecehio v. State, 896 So.2d 958 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Williams v. State, 858 So.2d 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Wood v. State, 717 So.2d 617 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Jones v. State, 721 So.2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Soto v. State, 711 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Having considered the Committee’s amended report, we hereby authorize the publication and use of the instructions as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. In so doing, we express no opinion on the correctness of the instructions and remind all interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or alternative instructions, nor contesting the legal correctness of the instructions. We further caution all interested parties that any notes and comments associated with the instructions reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily indicative of the views of this Court as to [362]*362their correctness or applicability. New language is indicated by underlining, and deleted language is struck-through. The instructions as set forth in the appendix shall be effective when this opinion becomes final.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

28.9 NO VALID OPERATORS OR CHAUFFEUR’S DRIVER’S LICENSE

§ 322.03, Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of No Valid Operator’s — or Chauffeur’s Driver’s License, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Defendant) drove a motor vehicle upon a highway in this state.

2. At the time, The defendant [he] [she] did not have a valid operator’s or chauffeur’s driver’s license issued recognized by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles of the State of Florida.

Definitions.

§ 322.01(15), Fla. Stat.

“Drive” means to operate or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in any place open to the general public for purposes of vehicular traffic.

■§§-3-16.003(2),-&-316,003(21) § 322.01(26), Fla. Stat.

L “Motor vehicle” means any vehicle which is self-propelled, including a “moped,” (and every-vehiele which is-propelled by electric power obtained — fi?em—overhead—trolley

wires, but not-operated upon rails),

but not including any bicycle or “moped” vehicle moved solely by human power, motorized wheelchair or motorized bicycle.

& “Valid operator’s or — chauffeur’s driver’s license” is means a operator’s or chauffeur’s driver’s license received from recognized by the department Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles which has not expired, been suspended, revoked or canceled.

§ 322.01(40)(38), Fla. Stat.

⅜ “Street or Highway” means the entire width between the boundary lines of every way or place publicly — maintained--when if any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel-traffic.

Optional Definitions.

L “Expired” means the license was not renewed on or before the expiration date.

§ 322.01(42)(a)(39), Fla. Stat.

2, “Suspended” means the privilege to drive a motor vehicle has been temporarily withdrawn.

§ 322.01 (12)(b)(35), Fla. Stat.

3* “Revoked” means the privilege to drive a motor vehicle has been terminated.

§ 322.01(42)(c)(5), Fla. Stat.

L “Canceled” means that a license which- was issued through error or

fraud has been declared void and terminated.

“Actual physical control” of a motor vehicle means the defendant must be physically in or on the vehicle and have the capability to operate the vehicle, re-

[363]*363gardless of whether [he] [she] is actually operating the vehicle at the time.

Lesser Included Offenses

No lesser included offenses have been identified for this offense.

Comment

This instruction was adopted in 1981, and amended in 2007.

28.9(a) NO VALID COMMERCIAL DRIVER’S LICENSE

To prove the crime of No Valid Commercial Driver’s License, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

L (Defendant) drove a commercial motor vehicle upon a highway in this state.

2. At the time, the defendant did not have a valid commercial driver’s license issued by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles of the State of Florida.

§ 322.01(15), Fla. Stat

“Drive” means to operate or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in any place open to the general public for purposes of vehicular traffic.

§ 822.01(26), Fla. Stat.

“Motor vehicle” means any vehicle which is self-propelled, including a “moped,” but not any vehicle moved solely by human power, motorized wheelchairs or motorized bicycles.

§ 322.01(8), Fla. Stat.

“Commercial motor vehicle” means any motor vehicle used on the streets or highways, which:

a.Has a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,001 pounds or more;

b. Is designed to transport more than 15 persons, including the driver, or;

c. Is transporting hazardous materials and is required to be placarded in accordance with Title 49 C.F.R.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
958 So. 2d 361, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 183, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 771, 2007 WL 1287506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-standard-jury-instructions-in-criminal-cases-no-2005-6-fla-2007.