In re Stanczak

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Stanczak

724 A.2d 927

DecidedJanuary 26, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 724 A.2d 927 (In re Stanczak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Stanczak, 724 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 1999, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 28, 1998, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that FREDERICK M. STANCZAK, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 1999, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 28, 1998, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that FREDERICK M. STANCZAK, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 A.2d 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stanczak-pa-1999.