In re Stahler

304 A.D.2d 245, 758 N.Y.S.2d 327, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4322

This text of 304 A.D.2d 245 (In re Stahler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Stahler, 304 A.D.2d 245, 758 N.Y.S.2d 327, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4322 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Alan Stabler was admitted to the practice of law [246]*246in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on May 2, 1983. Although respondent was not practicing law during the pertinent time period, he committed the acts relevant to this proceeding within the First Judicial Department.

Respondent was charged, along with other named defendants, in a 173-count indictment filed on June 9, 2000 in the Supreme Court, New York County. Pursuant to counts 5, 9 and 10, respondent was charged with securities fraud, a violation of General Business Law § 352-c (5), a class E felony. On March 7, 2003, respondent pleaded guilty to all three counts (5, 9 and 10) of securities fraud, a violation of General Business Law § 352-c (5). On June 6, 2002, respondent was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of IV2 to 3 years on each count, to run concurrently.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) upon the ground that he has been disbarred upon his conviction of a felony as defined by Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e).

Because a violation of General Business Law § 352-c (5) is a felony under Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e), respondent was automatically disbarred pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) upon his conviction of that offense. Accordingly, the Disciplinary Committee’s petition should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Andelas, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, as indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 352
New York GBS § 352
§ 90
New York JUD § 90(4)(e)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 A.D.2d 245, 758 N.Y.S.2d 327, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stahler-nyappdiv-2003.