In re Stagg

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Stagg

225 So. 3d 1050, 2017 WL 3902742

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 6, 2017

DocketNO. 2017-B-1087

StatusPublished

This text of 225 So. 3d 1050 (In re Stagg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Stagg, 225 So. 3d 1050, 2017 WL 3902742 (La. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM

11 Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that she negligently violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct: Rules 1.2 (scope of the representation), 1.4 (failure to communicate with a client), and 5,3 (responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistance). Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Catherine L. Stagg, Louisiana, Bar Roll number 12379, be and she hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall be placed on unsupervised probation for á period of two years, subject to the conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme - Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid. . .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI