in Re: Stacey Diane Sartor

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 10, 2015
Docket06-15-00027-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Stacey Diane Sartor (in Re: Stacey Diane Sartor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Stacey Diane Sartor, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 06-15-00027-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 6/10/2015 8:55:35 AM DEBBIE AUTREY CLERK

06-15-00027-CV FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS No. TEXARKANA, TEXAS 6/10/2015 8:55:35 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk

In the Court of Appeals

Sixth Judicial District

Texarkana, Texas

In re STACEY DIANE SARTOR, Relator

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Marianne Howland State Bar No. 24055693 Glen Wietzel State Bar No. 24447704 1940 Forest Ln. Garland. TX 7 5042 TeI:214.288.1731. Fax: 214.853.5835 mhowland@dfivcustody. com

Sartor lPetition for Writ of Mandamus Pase 1 of11 Identity of Parties and Counsel

The following is a list of all parties and all counsel who have appeared in

this maffer:

Relator: STACEY DIANE SARTOR

Attorneys for Relator in the trial court: Marianne Howland, 1940 Forest Ln.,

Garland, TX 75042, State Bar No. 24055693 and Glen Wietzel, 1,94A Forest Ln.,

Garland, TX75042, State Bar No. 24047704.

Respondent: ERIC CLIFFORD

Attorney for Respondent in the trial court: N/A

Real party in interest: JASON SARTOR

Attorney for real party in interest in the trial court: Jennifer Gibo, 109 1" Street

SE, Paris, Texas 75460, State BarNo. 24A32343.

Table of Contents

Index of Authorities iv

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS I

I. Statement of the Case 4

II. Statement of Jurisdiction 4

ru. Issues Presented 4

Issue No. I

W. Statement of Facts 4 Sartor I Petition for Writ of Mandamus Page2 ofll V. Argument and Authorities

A. Standard of Review: Availabilitv of Mandamus Relief

B. Issue No. 1: Respondent abused his discretion when he denied Motion

to Transfer Venue

Prayer

Certffication

Certificate of Service

APPENDICES: The following documents are attached to this petition and

incorporated in it for all purposes.

Appendix A: Affidavit of STACEY DIANE SARTOR

Appendix B:Attached to this petition are the following documents:

1. A certified copy of Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to

Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or, in the

Alternative, to Transfer Venue.

2. A certified copy of the Order Denying the Motion to Transfer signed

by Respondent.

Appendix C:Affidavit of Marianne Howland and Glen Wietzel with attached

exhibits: A and B.

Sartor lPetition for Writ of Mandamus ofll Page 3 Statement of the Case

l. The underlying suit is a suit to modiS. parent-child relationship, in

which Relator filed a motion to transfer venue.

2. Respondent denied Relator's motion to transfer venue on May 5,2415.

3. Respondent is ERIC CLIFFORD, Judge of the 6rH Judicial District

Court of Lamar County, Texas, whose address is 119 N. Main St. Paris, Texas

75460,

Statement of Juris diction

This Court has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus under section 6 of

article V of the Texas Constitution and section 22.221(a) of the Texas Government

Code.

Issues Presented

Issue No. 1: Respondent abused his discretion and failed to perform his mandatory

ministerial duty when he denied Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to

Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or, in the

Statement of Facts

Relator, STACEY DIANE SARTOR, resides in Hunt County, Texas with

the children the subject of this suit. Relator has resided in Hunt County with the

children for more than six months. These facts are undisputed. Sartor I Petition for Writ of Mandamus Page 4 of 1l JASON SARTOR resides in Kansas. It is undisputed that JASON SARTOR

resides in Kansas.

None of the parties to this case reside in Lamar County, Texas.

Relator timely filed Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss

for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or, in the Alternative, to

Transfer Venue. JASON SARTOR failed to file a controverting affidavit in

response to the Motion to Transfer Venue. Respondent, Judge Eric Clifford, heard

the motion on March 20,2015 at 10:00 a.m. Respondent denied Relator's motion

even though Respondent had a mandatory ministerial duty to transfer the case to

Hunt Counfy, Texas, where the children the subject of this suit have resided for

more than six months.

Respondent issued an Order Denying Motion to Transfer on May 5,2A15.

Relator requested Findings of Fact on May 29,2015. Respondent has not provided

his Findings of Fact.

Argument and Authorities

A. Standard of Review: Availability of Mandamus Relief.

Requisites of mandamus relief are a showing of (1) a legal duty to perform a

nondiscretionary act, (2) a demand for performance of a nondiscretionary act, and

(3) a refusal to perform after such demand was made. Erbs v. Bedard,760 S.W.2d

75A, 755 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1988) (orig proceeding). Mandamus relief is Sartor I Petition for Writ of Mandamus Page 5 of 11 available when under the circumstances of the case the facts and law permit the

trial court to make but one decision--and the trial court has refused to make that

decision--and remedy by appeal to correct the ruling is inadequate. Proffer v.

Yates,734 S.W.2d 671,673 (Tex. 1987) (otig. proceeding).

Mandamus is available to compel mandatory transfer in suits affecting the

parent-child relationship. Proffer, 734 S.W.2d at 672; Arias v. Spector, 623

S.W.2d 312, 313 (Tex. 1981) (orig. proceeding). Transfer of a case to a county

where the child has resided for more than six months is a mandatory ministerial

duty under section 11.06(b) (now section 155.201) of the Texas Family Code.

Proffer,734 S.W.2d at 673. Parents and children who have a right under the

mandatory venue provisions to venue in a particular county should not be forced to

go through a trial that is for naught. Proffer, 734 S.W.2d at 673. Justice demands

a speedy resolution of child custody and child support issues. Proffer, 734 S.W.2d

at 673.

B. Issue No. I

Relator should be granted relief because the trial judge abused his discretion

in denying the motion to transfer venue. The trial judge failed to perform his

mandatory ministerial duty to transfer the case to Hunt County, Texas.

Relator prays that this Court issue its writ of mandamus commanding the Sartor I Petition for Writ of Mandamus Page 6 ofll Venue.. ar; in the Alternative, b Tmnsfer Venue and ordering the trial cout to

grant Ei.rhrtor's Motion to Transfrr and transfcr tho case to Hunt Cornty, Texas.

Law Office of ldarianrre Howland l94O ForestLn. Galan4 T]{75A42 mhowland@dfl vurstody. oom

Marianrre Glen Wietzel Stde Ear No. Attorney for Reldor

Certificrtion

I crl,rtiff that I have reviewed the above petition and have consluded that ev€ry frH:ral statement inttrc petition is sryporhd by compe.tent evidenoe included

in the att:ar:hed app€ndix or record.

Ccrtificnte of Seryice

I rtrtiS that a tnre copy of this Petition for Writ of Mandamusi was served in

accordmrc,r: with rule 9"5 ofthe Toffis Rules of Appellate Procsdurc on each parly

or tlrat pu'y's lEad cousel ss follou,s:

Srtor lP*ition for Writ cfllandrorus Pagc 7 ofll accordance with rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on each party

or that party's lead counsel as follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proffer v. Yates
734 S.W.2d 671 (Texas Supreme Court, 1987)
Arias v. Spector
623 S.W.2d 312 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Stacey Diane Sartor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-stacey-diane-sartor-texcrimapp-2015.