in Re: Stacey Diane Sartor

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 10, 2015·No. 06-15-00027-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED

06-15-00027-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

6/10/2015 8:55:35 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

06-15-00027-CV

FILED IN

6th COURT OF APPEALS

No. TEXARKANA, TEXAS 6/10/2015 8:55:35 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

Clerk

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Judicial District Texarkana, Texas

In re STACEY DIANE SARTOR, Relator

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Marianne Howland

State Bar No. 24055693

Glen Wietzel

State Bar No. 24447704

1940 Forest Ln.

Garland. TX 7 5042

TeI:214.288.1731.

Fax: 214.853.5835

mhowland@dfivcustody. com

Sartor lPetition for Writ of Mandamus Pase 1 of11

Identity of Parties and Counsel The following is a list of all parties and all counsel who have appeared in this maffer: Relator: STACEY DIANE SARTOR Attorneys for Relator in the trial court: Marianne Howland, 1940 Forest Ln., Garland, TX 75042, State Bar No. 24055693 and Glen Wietzel, 1,94A Forest Ln., Garland, TX75042, State Bar No. 24047704. Respondent: ERIC CLIFFORD Attorney for Respondent in the trial court: N/A Real party in interest: JASON SARTOR Attorney for real party in interest in the trial court: Jennifer Gibo, 109 1" Street SE, Paris, Texas 75460, State BarNo. 24A32343. Table of Contents Index of Authorities iv PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS I I. Statement of the Case 4 II. Statement of Jurisdiction 4 ru. Issues Presented 4 Issue No. I

W. Statement of Facts 4 Sartor I Petition for Writ of Mandamus Page2 ofll

V. Argument and Authorities A. Standard of Review: Availabilitv of Mandamus Relief B. Issue No. 1: Respondent abused his discretion when he denied Motion to Transfer Venue Prayer Certffication Certificate of Service APPENDICES: The following documents are attached to this petition and incorporated in it for all purposes. Appendix A: Affidavit of STACEY DIANE SARTOR Appendix B:Attached to this petition are the following documents:

1. A certified copy of Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue.

2. A certified copy of the Order Denying the Motion to Transfer signed by Respondent. Appendix C:Affidavit of Marianne Howland and Glen Wietzel with attached exhibits: A and B.

Sartor lPetition for Writ of Mandamus ofll

Page 3

Statement of the Case l. The underlying suit is a suit to modiS. parent-child relationship, in which Relator filed a motion to transfer venue.

2. Respondent denied Relator's motion to transfer venue on May 5,2415.

3. Respondent is ERIC CLIFFORD, Judge of the 6rH Judicial District Court of Lamar County, Texas, whose address is 119 N. Main St. Paris, Texas 75460, Statement of Juris diction This Court has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus under section 6 of article V of the Texas Constitution and section 22.221(a) of the Texas Government Code. Issues Presented Issue No. 1: Respondent abused his discretion and failed to perform his mandatory ministerial duty when he denied Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue. Statement of Facts Relator, STACEY DIANE SARTOR, resides in Hunt County, Texas with the children the subject of this suit. Relator has resided in Hunt County with the

children for more than six months. These facts are undisputed.

Sartor I Petition for Writ of Mandamus Page 4 of 1l

JASON SARTOR resides in Kansas. It is undisputed that JASON SARTOR resides in Kansas.

None of the parties to this case reside in Lamar County, Texas.

Relator timely filed Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue. JASON SARTOR failed to file a controverting affidavit in response to the Motion to Transfer Venue. Respondent, Judge Eric Clifford, heard the motion on March 20,2015 at 10:00 a.m. Respondent denied Relator's motion even though Respondent had a mandatory ministerial duty to transfer the case to Hunt Counfy, Texas, where the children the subject of this suit have resided for more than six months.

Respondent issued an Order Denying Motion to Transfer on May 5,2A15.

Relator requested Findings of Fact on May 29,2015. Respondent has not provided his Findings of Fact. Argument and Authorities A. Standard of Review: Availability of Mandamus Relief.

Requisites of mandamus relief are a showing of (1) a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act, (2) a demand for performance of a nondiscretionary act, and (3) a refusal to perform after such demand was made. Erbs v. Bedard,760 S.W.2d

75A, 755 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1988) (orig proceeding). Mandamus relief is Sartor I Petition for Writ of Mandamus Page 5 of 11 available when under the circumstances of the case the facts and law permit the trial court to make but one decision--and the trial court has refused to make that decision--and remedy by appeal to correct the ruling is inadequate. Proffer v.

Yates,734 S.W.2d 671,673 (Tex. 1987) (otig. proceeding).

Mandamus is available to compel mandatory transfer in suits affecting the parent-child relationship. Proffer, 734 S.W.2d at 672; Arias v. Spector, 623 S.W.2d 312, 313 (Tex. 1981) (orig. proceeding). Transfer of a case to a county where the child has resided for more than six months is a mandatory ministerial duty under section 11.06(b) (now section 155.201) of the Texas Family Code. Proffer,734 S.W.2d at 673. Parents and children who have a right under the mandatory venue provisions to venue in a particular county should not be forced to go through a trial that is for naught. Proffer, 734 S.W.2d at 673. Justice demands a speedy resolution of child custody and child support issues. Proffer, 734 S.W.2d at 673. B. Issue No. I Relator should be granted relief because the trial judge abused his discretion in denying the motion to transfer venue. The trial judge failed to perform his mandatory ministerial duty to transfer the case to Hunt County, Texas. Prayer

Relator prays that this Court issue its writ of mandamus commanding the Sartor I Petition for Writ of Mandamus Page 6 ofll

Venue.. ar; in the Alternative, b Tmnsfer Venue and ordering the trial cout to grant Ei.rhrtor's Motion to Transfrr and transfcr tho case to Hunt Cornty, Texas.

Law Office of ldarianrre Howland l94O ForestLn.

Galan4 T]{75A42

mhowland@dfl vurstody. oom

Marianrre Glen Wietzel Stde Ear No.

Attorney for Reldor

Certificrtion

I crl,rtiff that I have reviewed the above petition and have consluded that ev€ry frH:ral statement inttrc petition is sryporhd by compe.tent evidenoe included

in the att:ar:hed app€ndix or record.

Ccrtificnte of Seryice

I rtrtiS that a tnre copy of this Petition for Writ of Mandamusi was served in accordmrc,r: with rule 9"5 ofthe Toffis Rules of Appellate Procsdurc on each parly or tlrat pu'y's lEad cousel ss follou,s:

Srtor lP*ition for Writ cfllandrorus Pagc 7 ofll accordance with rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on each party or that party's lead counsel as follows: Parfy: JASON SARTOR Lead attorney: Jennifer Gibo Address of service: 119 I't Street SE, Paris, Texas 75460 Method of service: via facsimile: 903-905-4966 Date of service: June 11. 2015

A copy of this notice is being filed with the appellate clerk in accordance with rule 25.1(e) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Marianne land

Glen Wietzel

Attorneys for Relator

Sartor I Petition for Writ of Mandamus Page 8 of 11

Apperul,x l; Affidavit of STACEY DIANE SARTOR li'[r\CHY DIAI-IE SARTOR app€ared in person beforc me today and $tated under rurth:

ulil'r nane is STACEY DIAtfE SARTOR I arn above the age of eighteen

years of erge, and I arr fully competent to make this atrdsvit I am the Relator in this Pe{f :ilm for Writ of Mandamus. The futs stafd in this atrdavit are within my

persoruil linowlodge and are trus and corrccL I lmve resided iil ffifit County wilh thc childrsn the subject ofthis suit sinc€ lvlay 20,1{, I lil,rd my Defendant's Notis€ of Motion and Mation to Dismiss for Lapk of Persorurl .'ruisdic{ion and Improper Venue, ffi, h the Altsrnntive, to Tranefcr

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Stacey Diane Sartor, (Tex. 2015).

in Re: Stacey Diane Sartor (in Re: Stacey Diane Sartor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proffer v. Yates
734 S.W.2d 671 (Texas Supreme Court, 1987)
Arias v. Spector
623 S.W.2d 312 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)