In Re Stacey Bernard Martin v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 23, 2024

No. 04-24-00449-CV

IN RE Stacey Bernard MARTIN, Relator

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Pro se relator Stacey Bernard Martin has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. 2 This court has determined that relator is not entitled to any of the relief sought. Therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for orders are both DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8.

It is so ORDERED on October 23, 2024.

_____________________________

Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of October, 2024.

_____________________________

Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2023-CI-18641, in the166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas the Honorable Christine Vasquez-Hortick and the Honorable Rosie Alvarado presiding. 2 On July 9, 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On July 26, 2024, relator filed a motion which we treat as a petition for writ of mandamus based on the substance of his filing and the relief sought. See Surgitek, Bristol- Myers Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (considering the substance of pleading rather than form or caption to determine its nature). We will treat both filings as a single petition for writ of mandamus.