In re St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co.
This text of 142 Okla. 300 (In re St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Tax Review sustaining the protest of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, against illegal and excessive tax levies for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1928, by the county excise board of Tulsa county. Protestee appeals.
The ground of the protest was that the levy made for sinking fund purposes for the city of Tulsa included an amount which the city contends is necessary to pay interest accruals for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1929.
The Court of Tax Review held that this levy was illegal to the extent of the interest accruals for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1929.
We discussed this identical question in cause No. 20142, Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, 142 Okla. 8, 285 Pac. 48, and there held the levy excessive and illegal. We there said:
“An excise board is without authority of law to make an appropriation for the payment of interest on outstanding bonded indebtedness which matures subsequent to the fiscal year for which the appropriation is made.”
We announce the same ruling here.
The judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 Okla. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-st-louis-s-f-ry-co-okla-1929.