In re Spotts
This text of 91 F. App'x 295 (In re Spotts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kelvin Andre Spotts petitions for a writ of mandamus ordering the district court to produce for his inspection transcripts of the grand jury proceedings that resulted in his criminal indictment. Spotts previously sought the same relief in his appeal of the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We denied the request for a writ of mandamus in that action. United States v. Spotts, No. O3-7794 (4th Cir. Feb. 25, 2004). Accordingly, Spotts’ mandamus petition is denied. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 F. App'x 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-spotts-ca4-2004.