In re Sperling

Court of Appeals of Maryland

In re Sperling

194 A.3d 399, 461 Md. 477

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided September 28, 2018·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 13, Sept. Term, 2018·Published

Opinion

Upon consideration of the Petition for Reinstatement of Samuel Sperling and the responses filed thereto, in the above captioned case, it is this 28th day of September, 2018,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner, Samuel Sperling, be, and is hereby, reinstated to *400the practice of law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of Samuel Sperling upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of the Petition for Reinstatement of Samuel Sperling and the responses filed thereto, in the above captioned case, it is this 28th day of September, 2018,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner, Samuel Sperling, be, and is hereby, reinstated to *400the practice of law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of Samuel Sperling upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this state.

In re Sperling, 194 A.3d 399, 461 Md. 477 (Md. 2018).

Pincite

194 A.3d 399 (In re Sperling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.