In re Spencer
This text of 22 F. App'x 173 (In re Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On August 1, 2001, Michael Lee Spencer, Sr., filed this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to act on his motion for declaratory and injunctive relief and on his motion for an accelerated hearing, both filed in the district court on June 26, 2001. The district court entered an order denying both of these motions on August 24, 2001; Spencer’s petition for mandamus is therefore moot. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this petition, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-spencer-ca4-2001.