In re Spence

122 S.E.2d 69, 255 N.C. 526, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 631
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 18, 1961·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

There are no exceptions to the findings of fact. The [527] judgment awarding custody based on the findings, particularly finding number 8, was properly entered. In re Gibbons, 245 N.C. 24, 95 S.E. 2d 85; s.c. 247 N.C. 273, 101 S.E. 2d 16.

The exception to the admission in evidence of letters from petitioner commending respondent for the manner in which he had cared for the children is without merit. They contradict the assertion now made that respondent has always neglected his children.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Spence, 122 S.E.2d 69, 255 N.C. 526, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 631 (N.C. 1961).

122 S.E.2d 69 (In re Spence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Gibbons
101 S.E.2d 16 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
In Re Gibbons
95 S.E.2d 85 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)