In re Spence

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re Spence

122 S.E.2d 69, 255 N.C. 526, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 631

DecidedOctober 18, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E.2d 69 (In re Spence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Spence, 122 S.E.2d 69, 255 N.C. 526, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 631 (N.C. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

There are no exceptions to the findings of fact. The [527]*527judgment awarding custody based on the findings, particularly finding number 8, was properly entered. In re Gibbons, 245 N.C. 24, 95 S.E. 2d 85; s.c. 247 N.C. 273, 101 S.E. 2d 16.

The exception to the admission in evidence of letters from petitioner commending respondent for the manner in which he had cared for the children is without merit. They contradict the assertion now made that respondent has always neglected his children.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

There are no exceptions to the findings of fact. The [527]*527judgment awarding custody based on the findings, particularly finding number 8, was properly entered. In re Gibbons, 245 N.C. 24, 95 S.E. 2d 85; s.c. 247 N.C. 273, 101 S.E. 2d 16.

The exception to the admission in evidence of letters from petitioner commending respondent for the manner in which he had cared for the children is without merit. They contradict the assertion now made that respondent has always neglected his children.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.E.2d 69, 255 N.C. 526, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-spence-nc-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack