In Re Spell

659 S.E.2d 106, 377 S.C. 1, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 76
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 6, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 659 S.E.2d 106 (In Re Spell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Spell, 659 S.E.2d 106, 377 S.C. 1, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 76 (S.C. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

On March 12, 2007, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for one year, retroactive to August 24, 2005. In the Matter of Spell, 372 S.C. 514, 642 S.E.2d 749 (2007). Petitioner has filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommends the petition be granted, subject to the condition that petitioner establish a mentoring relationship with a member of the South Carolina Bar with at least ten years of experience in the practice of real estate law and that the mentor review petitioner’s practices and procedures with regard to his real estate practice and provide reports to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel six months and twelve months after petitioner’s reinstatement. We grant the petition, subject to the condition set forth by the Committee on Character and Fitness, and reinstate petitioner to the practice of law in South Carolina.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, JOHN H. WALLER, JR., COSTA M. PLEICONES, and DONALD W. BEATTY, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Spell
642 S.E.2d 749 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
659 S.E.2d 106, 377 S.C. 1, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-spell-sc-2008.