In Re Spell

659 S.E.2d 106, 377 S.C. 1, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 76
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Spell. Read the opinion of the Court — 372 S.C. 514
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 6, 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On March 12, 2007, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for one year, retroactive to August 24, 2005. In the Matter of Spell, 372 S.C. 514, 642 S.E.2d 749 (2007). Petitioner has filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommends the petition be granted, subject to the condition that petitioner establish a mentoring relationship with a member of the South Carolina Bar with at least ten years of experience in the practice of real estate law and that the mentor review petitioner’s practices and procedures with regard to his real estate practice and provide reports to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel six months and twelve months after petitioner’s reinstatement. We grant the petition, subject to the condition set forth by the Committee on Character and Fitness, and reinstate petitioner to the practice of law in South Carolina.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, JOHN H. WALLER, JR., COSTA M. PLEICONES, and DONALD W. BEATTY, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Spell, 659 S.E.2d 106, 377 S.C. 1, 2008 S.C. LEXIS 76 (S.C. 2008).

659 S.E.2d 106 (In Re Spell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Spell
642 S.E.2d 749 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2007)