In re Spector

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Spector

724 A.2d 796, 157 N.J. 530, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 187

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 12, 1999·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 20,1998, having filed with the Court a report concluding that STEPHEN R. SPECTOR of ENGLEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct [531] involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STEPHEN R. SPECTOR is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 20,1998, having filed with the Court a report concluding that STEPHEN R. SPECTOR of ENGLEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct [531] involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STEPHEN R. SPECTOR is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Spector, 724 A.2d 796, 157 N.J. 530, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 187 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

724 A.2d 796 (In re Spector) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.