In re Spector
This text of 724 A.2d 796 (In re Spector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on October 20,1998, having filed with the Court a report concluding that STEPHEN R. SPECTOR of ENGLEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct [531]*531involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that STEPHEN R. SPECTOR is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
724 A.2d 796, 157 N.J. 530, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-spector-nj-1999.