In Re Special Investigation No. 229
This text of 458 A.2d 80 (In Re Special Investigation No. 229) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is yet another case involving the accountant-client privilege. See In Re Special Investigation No. 236, 295 Md. 573, 458 A.2d 75 (1983), for a case argued the same day. This proceeding also involves the investigation by the Attorney General into Medicaid fraud. A subpoena was laid in the *585 hands of an accountant. Those whose papers were affected sought and obtained an order of the Criminal Court of Baltimore quashing the subpoena on the grounds of the accountant-client privilege. The Attorney General appealed to the Court of Special Appeals. On our own motion we issued a writ of certiorari prior to hearing in the latter court.
This appeal must be dismissed. The term of the grand jury in question has expired. No effort was made to have the grand jury continued beyond its term. Thus, if we were to reverse in this proceeding there would be no one to whom the subpoena would be returnable. See In Re Special Investigation No. 195, 295 Md. 276, 454 A.2d 843 (1983).
Appeal dismissed; appellant to pay the costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 A.2d 80, 295 Md. 584, 1983 Md. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-special-investigation-no-229-md-1983.