In Re Special Investigation No. 229

458 A.2d 80, 295 Md. 584, 1983 Md. LEXIS 217
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 28, 1983·No. [No. 116, September Term, 1982.]·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is yet another case involving the accountant-client privilege. See In Re Special Investigation No. 236, 295 Md. 573, 458 A.2d 75 (1983), for a case argued the same day. This proceeding also involves the investigation by the Attorney General into Medicaid fraud. A subpoena was laid in the *585 hands of an accountant. Those whose papers were affected sought and obtained an order of the Criminal Court of Baltimore quashing the subpoena on the grounds of the accountant-client privilege. The Attorney General appealed to the Court of Special Appeals. On our own motion we issued a writ of certiorari prior to hearing in the latter court.

This appeal must be dismissed. The term of the grand jury in question has expired. No effort was made to have the grand jury continued beyond its term. Thus, if we were to reverse in this proceeding there would be no one to whom the subpoena would be returnable. See In Re Special Investigation No. 195, 295 Md. 276, 454 A.2d 843 (1983).

Appeal dismissed; appellant to pay the costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Special Investigation No. 229, 458 A.2d 80, 295 Md. 584, 1983 Md. LEXIS 217 (Md. 1983).

458 A.2d 80 (In Re Special Investigation No. 229) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BAA, PLC v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co.
929 A.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
Taylor v. United States
601 A.2d 1060 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1991)
In Re Special Investigation No. 281
473 A.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1984)
In Re Special Investigation No. 249
461 A.2d 1082 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
In Re Special Investigation No. 244
459 A.2d 1111 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
In Re a Special Investigation No. 224
458 A.2d 454 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1983)