In re Sparrow

138 S. Ct. 309, 199 L. Ed. 2d 201, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4464
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Sparrow. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 S. Ct. 1050
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 2, 2017·No. No. D–2997.·Published

Opinion

Marvin R. Sparrow, of Rutherfordton, North Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sparrow, 138 S. Ct. 309, 199 L. Ed. 2d 201, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4464 (U.S. 2017).

138 S. Ct. 309 (In re Sparrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.