In re Sparrow

138 S. Ct. 309, 199 L. Ed. 2d 201, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4464
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 2, 2017
DocketNo. D–2997.
StatusPublished

This text of 138 S. Ct. 309 (In re Sparrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Sparrow, 138 S. Ct. 309, 199 L. Ed. 2d 201, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4464 (U.S. 2017).

Opinion

Marvin R. Sparrow, of Rutherfordton, North Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 S. Ct. 309, 199 L. Ed. 2d 201, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sparrow-scotus-2017.