In re Spar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Spar

100 A.D.2d 71, 473 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17343

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 71 (In re Spar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Spar, 100 A.D.2d 71, 473 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was disbarred on consent in 1977. Thereafter, he continued to practice law from time to time. He recently pleaded guilty to a charge of unauthorized practice of law (Judiciary Law, § 486) and was sentenced to five years’ probation.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee moves to confirm the report of Referee Morris Aarons to hold the respondent in contempt. The referee also recommends a fine with a period of imprisonment on default thereof.

The report of the referee that the respondent should be held in contempt is confirmed. However, in view of the [72]*72sentence in the criminal proceeding, it would be redundant to impose a fine. If the respondent again engages in the unauthorized practice of law, the probation would be revoked.

Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Carro and Asch, JJ., concur.

Motion to confirm the report of the referee is granted to the extent it seeks to hold respondent in contempt and the motion is otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI