in Re: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and Sbc Communications, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 26, 2005
Docket13-05-00659-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and Sbc Communications, Inc. (in Re: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and Sbc Communications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and Sbc Communications, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-659-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

IN RE SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC., SOUTHWESTERN BELL WIRELESS, INC., SOUTHWESTERN BELL WIRELESS, L.L.C., CINGULAR WIRELESS, L.L.C., AND

SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

__________________________________________________________________

                      On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

                   Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Rodriguez

                            Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]


Relators, Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and SBC Communications, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on October 25, 2005.  The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and its appendix, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Furthermore, relators' motion for emergency temporary relief filed on October 25, 2005, is also denied.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 26th day of October, 2005.



[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and Sbc Communications, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-southwestern-bell-mobile-systems-inc-southwestern-bell-wireless-texapp-2005.