in Re: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and Sbc Communications, Inc.
This text of in Re: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and Sbc Communications, Inc. (in Re: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and Sbc Communications, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-05-659-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
IN RE SOUTHWESTERN BELL MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC., SOUTHWESTERN BELL WIRELESS, INC., SOUTHWESTERN BELL WIRELESS, L.L.C., CINGULAR WIRELESS, L.L.C., AND
SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Rodriguez
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
Relators, Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and SBC Communications, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on October 25, 2005. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and its appendix, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Furthermore, relators' motion for emergency temporary relief filed on October 25, 2005, is also denied.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 26th day of October, 2005.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc., Southwestern Bell Wireless, L.L.C., Cingular Wireless, L.L.C., and Sbc Communications, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-southwestern-bell-mobile-systems-inc-southwestern-bell-wireless-texapp-2005.