In Re Soriano

19 A.3d 983, 206 N.J. 138, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 636
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 7, 2011·No. D-92 September Term 2010, 067957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-369, concluding that WILLIAM J. SORIANO of ROSELAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be censured for violating RPC 1.2(d) (assisting a client in fraudulent conduct), RPC 1.5(b) (failing to explain the rate or basis of a fee in writing), RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest), RPC 1.15(b) (failing to deliver funds promptly to clients), RPC 4.1(a)(1) (making a false statement of material fact or law to a third person), RPC 8.4(a) (violating the Rules of Professional Conduct), and RPC 8.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM J. SORIANO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Soriano, 19 A.3d 983, 206 N.J. 138, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 636 (N.J. 2011).

19 A.3d 983 (In Re Soriano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Smith
19 A.3d 983 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)