in Re: Sophia Delaunay
This text of in Re: Sophia Delaunay (in Re: Sophia Delaunay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-03-719-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________
IN RE: SOPHIA DELAUNAY
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Castillo
Per Curiam
Relator Sophia Delaunay has filed a motion for rehearing of a panel decision to deny mandamus relief and a motion to reconsider grant of temporary relief. Mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law and there is no adequate appellate remedy. CSR Ltd. v. Link, 925 S.W.2d 591, 596 (Tex. 1996) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Relator did not show, and has not shown, she has no adequate remedy by appeal. We deny the motion for rehearing and the motion to reconsider grant of temporary relief.
Opinion delivered and filed
this 6th day of January, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Sophia Delaunay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sophia-delaunay-texapp-2004.