in Re: Sonny King, Jr.
This text of in Re: Sonny King, Jr. (in Re: Sonny King, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00618-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: SONNY KING, JR.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Relator, Sonny King, Jr., pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court alleging that respondent, the Honorable Robert C. Cheshire, presiding judge of the
377th Judicial District Court of Victoria County, Texas, abused his discretion by failing to
rule on relator’s “Writ of Right” in trial court cause number 03-10-20-444-D. Relator also
complains that the trial court has neither answered nor responded to his motion to compel
a ruling on his "Writ of Right." This Court, having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition, is of the opinion
that the relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator’s
petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 13th day of November, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Sonny King, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sonny-king-jr-texapp-2009.