in Re: Sonia Alvarez
This text of in Re: Sonia Alvarez (in Re: Sonia Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered July 23, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00856-CV
IN RE SONIA ALVAREZ, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-16957
ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges and Justice Stoddart
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.
Although we have considered relator’s petition and the attached appendix in concluding that
mandamus relief is not warranted, because relator’s supporting appendix is not properly redacted
in accordance with the rules of appellate procedure, we STRIKE relator’s petition and
supporting appendix. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k). We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this
original proceeding. We DIRECT the clerk to provide a copy of this order to all parties and to
Tanner Joy Feast, official court reporter of the 254th Judicial District Court. Because we have
disposed of relator’s petition, the court reporter’s contest of relator’s affidavit of indigence is
moot and it is not necessary for the relator to file a reporter’s record in this case.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Sonia Alvarez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sonia-alvarez-texapp-2015.