in Re Sondra Grohman
This text of in Re Sondra Grohman (in Re Sondra Grohman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 9, 2022
No. 04-22-00583-CV
IN RE Sondra GROHMAN
From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas Trial Court No. 15705 Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding
Original Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
On September 9, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for stay pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s motion for emergency relief is DENIED as moot.2
It is so ORDERED on September 9, 2022.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: ________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15705, styled In the Matter of The Marriage of Sondra Grohman and Larry Wegner, pending in the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, the Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III presiding. 2 Opinion to follow.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Sondra Grohman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sondra-grohman-texapp-2022.