Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Sonderlick

In re Sonderlick

265 A.D. 394, 39 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6307
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1943·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to,confirm the report of the referee should be denied. In view, however, of the respondent’s inexperience, we think that a censure is sufficient punishment.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Glennon and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote to confirm the report of the referee and to dismiss the proceeding.

Eespondent censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sonderlick, 265 A.D. 394, 39 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

265 A.D. 394 (In re Sonderlick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.