Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Sonderlick

In re Sonderlick

265 A.D. 394, 39 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6307
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1943
StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D. 394 (In re Sonderlick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Sonderlick, 265 A.D. 394, 39 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to,confirm the report of the referee should be denied. In view, however, of the respondent’s inexperience, we think that a censure is sufficient punishment.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Glennon and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote to confirm the report of the referee and to dismiss the proceeding.

Eespondent censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 394, 39 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sonderlick-nyappdiv-1943.