In re Sommer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sommer

177 A.D.2d 489, 575 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14177

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 177 A.D.2d 489 (In re Sommer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sommer, 177 A.D.2d 489, 575 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to vacate the final settlement of the estate of Sigmund Sommer, deceased, the petitioner Jack Sommer appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Harrington, S.), dated April 9, 1990, which denied his motion [490]*490to vacate the appointment of Henry J. Kalinowski as a Referee to supervise discovery proceedings.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The appellant’s motion to vacate the appointment of the Referee, made approximately five months after the appointment, was untimely (see, CPLR 2221, 5513 [a]; Henegar v Freudenheim, 40 AD2d 825). In any event, we find the motion to be without merit. The provision for designation of a Judicial Hearing Officer as a Referee in CPLR 3104 (b) does not limit the court’s general power to name a Referee granted in CPLR 3104 (a). Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to vacate the final settlement of the estate of Sigmund Sommer, deceased, the petitioner Jack Sommer appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Harrington, S.), dated April 9, 1990, which denied his motion [490]*490to vacate the appointment of Henry J. Kalinowski as a Referee to supervise discovery proceedings.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The appellant’s motion to vacate the appointment of the Referee, made approximately five months after the appointment, was untimely (see, CPLR 2221, 5513 [a]; Henegar v Freudenheim, 40 AD2d 825). In any event, we find the motion to be without merit. The provision for designation of a Judicial Hearing Officer as a Referee in CPLR 3104 (b) does not limit the court’s general power to name a Referee granted in CPLR 3104 (a). Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.D.2d 489, 575 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sommer-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack