in Re Somith Chindavong
This text of in Re Somith Chindavong (in Re Somith Chindavong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 25, 2010.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-09-00989-CR
In Re Somith Chindavong, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 20, 2009, relator, Somith Chindavong, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Jeannine Barr, presiding judge of the 182nd District Court of Harris County, to rule on a pending motion for nunc pro tunc for jail time credit, and grant him the requested credit.
On August 1, 2008, the trial court entered judgment awarding credit for time served from November 2, 2004 to November 22, 2004, and June 18, 2008 to August 1, 2008.
On March 6, 2009, relator filed a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc requesting that he be awarded credit for time served in the custody of the Houston Police Department from November 1, 2004 to November 3, 2004; Fort Bend County Jail from March 9, 2005 to June 9, 2008; Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (constructive custody) from June 9, 2008 to June 18, 2008; and Harris County Jail from November 3, 2004 to November 22, 2004, and June 18, 2008 to August 1, 2008.
On November 25, 2009, the trial court signed an order nunc pro tunc granting credit for jail time from November 2, 2004 to November 22, 2004, and March 9, 2005 to August 1, 2008. In light of the trial court’s November 25, 2009 nunc pro tunc order granting credit for jail time, relator’s request for relief is moot.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Frost, and Brown.
Do not publish—Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Somith Chindavong, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-somith-chindavong-texapp-2010.