in Re Somaiah Kholaif
Opinion
Motion for Reconsideration Dismissed as Moot; Opinion of July 18, 2019 Withdrawn; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied; Order filed October 10, 2019.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-18-00950-CV ____________
IN RE SOMAIAH KHOLAIF, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS Probate Court No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 449677
ORDER
On October 30, 2018, relator Somaiah Kholaif filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In her petition, relator asked this court to compel the Honorable Rory R. Olsen, former presiding judge of the Probate Court No. 3 of Harris County, to vacate his order quashing her request for discovery. With certain exceptions, to obtain mandamus relief a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Relator has not shown that she is entitled to mandamus relief.
On July 18, 2019, we issued an opinion denying relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Relator has filed a motion for en banc reconsideration.
We sua sponte withdraw this court’s July 18, 2019 opinion, issue this order pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(d), deny the petition for a writ of mandamus, and dismiss the motion for en banc reconsideration as moot without prejudice to relator’s right to file a motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Bourliot and Spain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Somaiah Kholaif (in Re Somaiah Kholaif) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.