In re Solow

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Solow

768 A.2d 779, 167 N.J. 55, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 338

DecidedApril 3, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 768 A.2d 779 (In re Solow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Solow, 768 A.2d 779, 167 N.J. 55, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 338 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JOEL M. SOLOW of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.2 (failing to expedite litigation), RPC 3.5(e) (conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOEL M. SOLOW is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JOEL M. SOLOW of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.2 (failing to expedite litigation), RPC 3.5(e) (conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOEL M. SOLOW is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

768 A.2d 779, 167 N.J. 55, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-solow-nj-2001.