In re Solomon's Estate

New York Surrogate's Court

In re Solomon's Estate

145 N.Y.S. 528

DecidedJanuary 29, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 145 N.Y.S. 528 (In re Solomon's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Solomon's Estate, 145 N.Y.S. 528 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

FOWLER, S.

[1,2] The will of Mrs. Solomon was revoked by her second marriage, but confirmed by a codicil, if the latter is probative. I should like very much to find that the codicil was duly executed, as the dying woman had it under her pillow, and I am convinced that there is an effort in some instances to defeat the probate of unwelcome wills by some family arrangement, occasionally connived at by the attesting witnesses. Such attempts are so contrary to public policy and good citizenship that they should be rebuked and frustrated in a court of probate, if possible. In this proceeding, unfortunately, as I believe, the testimony of the attesting witnesses of a noncompliance with the statute of wills is too positive to be overcome by a presumption from the very full certificate of attestation contradicting the attesting witnesses. Had the witnesses admitted a loss of memory, I should have presumed for the will despite their testimony; but the cross-examination only made them the more positive that they remembered all that took place. What took place, according to them, defeats probate.

Probate refused. Settle decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOWLER, S.

[1,2] The will of Mrs. Solomon was revoked by her second marriage, but confirmed by a codicil, if the latter is probative. I should like very much to find that the codicil was duly executed, as the dying woman had it under her pillow, and I am convinced that there is an effort in some instances to defeat the probate of unwelcome wills by some family arrangement, occasionally connived at by the attesting witnesses. Such attempts are so contrary to public policy and good citizenship that they should be rebuked and frustrated in a court of probate, if possible. In this proceeding, unfortunately, as I believe, the testimony of the attesting witnesses of a noncompliance with the statute of wills is too positive to be overcome by a presumption from the very full certificate of attestation contradicting the attesting witnesses. Had the witnesses admitted a loss of memory, I should have presumed for the will despite their testimony; but the cross-examination only made them the more positive that they remembered all that took place. What took place, according to them, defeats probate.

Probate refused. Settle decree accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 N.Y.S. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-solomons-estate-nysurct-1914.