In re Solomon

66 A.3d 764, 620 Pa. 216, 2013 WL 2215139, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 1009
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 21, 2013·No. No. 62 EM 2013·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 2013, upon review of Judge Christine Solomon’s Answer to this Court’s April 18, 2013 Rule to Show Cause, we hereby appoint the Honorable William H. Platt, Senior Judge of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, to serve as this Court’s Master.. Senior Judge Platt shall gather necessary factual information and shall consider pertinent legal questions. The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts is directed to at[765] tend any hearings below and participate as necessary.

Senior Judge Platt shall forward his Report and Recommendations, detailing proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, as soon as practicable. Upon the filing of the Report and Recommendation, Judge Solomon shall have twenty (20) days to lodge objections in this Court, if any. The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts shall have fourteen (14) days from the date on which it is served with Judge Solomon’s objections to file an answer.

Jurisdiction is retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Solomon, 66 A.3d 764, 620 Pa. 216, 2013 WL 2215139, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 1009 (Pa. 2013).

66 A.3d 764 (In re Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re: Phila. Traffic Court Judge Christine Solomon
106 A.3d 671 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
In Re: Magisterial District Judge Mark Bruno
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014
In re Bruno
101 A.3d 635 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)