In re Solomon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Solomon

844 A.2d 509, 179 N.J. 224, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 170

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 25, 2004·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-323, concluding that BRIAN D. SOLOMON of STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a) and Rule 1:21-1 (failure to maintain a bona fide office in New Jersey), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRIAN D. SOLOMON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[225] ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-323, concluding that BRIAN D. SOLOMON of STATEN ISLAND, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a) and Rule 1:21-1 (failure to maintain a bona fide office in New Jersey), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRIAN D. SOLOMON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[225] ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Solomon, 844 A.2d 509, 179 N.J. 224, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 170 (N.J. 2004).

Pincite

844 A.2d 509 (In re Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.