In re Solis

136 S. Ct. 563, 193 L. Ed. 2d 452, 84 U.S.L.W. 3301, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7451
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 30, 2015·No. No. 15–6698.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) are paid and petitions submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Solis, 136 S. Ct. 563, 193 L. Ed. 2d 452, 84 U.S.L.W. 3301, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7451 (U.S. 2015).

136 S. Ct. 563 (In re Solis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)