In re Sohmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sohmer

3 A.D.2d 89, 158 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3366

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 89 (In re Sohmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sohmer, 3 A.D.2d 89, 158 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent is charged with professional misconduct in twice converting clients’ funds for his personal use. The record establishes ample support for the Referee’s findings that respondent not only converted several thousand dollars belonging to his clients but also gave false testimony in an attempt to mask his misconduct. The Referee also found, justifiably, that respondent knowingly issued a large number of bad checks. Respondent should be disbarred.

Peck, P. J., Botein, Rabin, Cox and Valente, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent is charged with professional misconduct in twice converting clients’ funds for his personal use. The record establishes ample support for the Referee’s findings that respondent not only converted several thousand dollars belonging to his clients but also gave false testimony in an attempt to mask his misconduct. The Referee also found, justifiably, that respondent knowingly issued a large number of bad checks. Respondent should be disbarred.

Peck, P. J., Botein, Rabin, Cox and Valente, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 89, 158 N.Y.S.2d 210, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sohmer-nyappdiv-1956.