In re Snyder
This text of 511 F. App'x 270 (In re Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robin Neil Snyder petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to act on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that the district court denied the motion on January 17, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court recently decided Snyder’s § 2255 motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
511 F. App'x 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-snyder-ca4-2013.