In re Sneed
This text of 238 A.D.2d 74 (In re Sneed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Respondent, Benjamin Sneed,
By an order and decision of this Court (191 AD2d 118), entered July 13, 1993, respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years for neglecting legal matters entrusted to him, failing to timely withdraw from a case, and converting client funds, albeit without venal intent.
Respondent was charged in a superior court information filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, with grand larceny in the fourth degree, in violation of Penal Law § 155.30, a class E felony under the laws of the State of New York, and with practicing law while suspended (a misdemeanor) in violation of section 486 of the Judiciary Law. On June 7, 1996, respondent pleaded guilty and was sentenced on April 29, 1997 to five years’ probation.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) on the ground that he has been disbarred upon conviction of a felony as defined by Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e).
Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) provides: "Any person being an attorney and counsellor-at-law who shall be convicted of a felony as defined in paragraph e of this subdivision, shall upon such conviction, cease to be an attorney and counsellor-at-law, or to be competent to practice law as such.”
Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "For purposes of this subdivision, the term felony shall mean any criminal offense classified as a felony under the laws of this state”.
Respondent stands convicted of a felony under New York law (Penal Law § 155.30) and, therefore, automatically ceases to be an attorney and counselor-at-law (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]).
Accordingly, the petition should be granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys.
Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ., concur.
Respondent is disbarred from practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Respondent has not appeared in this proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 A.D.2d 74, 667 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sneed-nyappdiv-1997.