In re Snavely

Louisiana Court of Appeal

In re Snavely

258 So. 3d 52

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided December 13, 2017·No. 17–238·Published

Opinion

SAVOIE, Judge.

*53For the reasons set forth in Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC , 17-237 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/17), 257 So.3d 1264, the exception of prescription filed by Ms. Snavely and J. Lomax Jordan is granted. Defendants' motions seeking attorney fees as sanctions filed in each of the three consolidated matters are dismissed with prejudice. All costs of this appeal are assessed to Defendants.

PRESCRIPTION EXCEPTION GRANTED; DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAVOIE, Judge.

*53For the reasons set forth in Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC , 17-237 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/17), 257 So.3d 1264, the exception of prescription filed by Ms. Snavely and J. Lomax Jordan is granted. Defendants' motions seeking attorney fees as sanctions filed in each of the three consolidated matters are dismissed with prejudice. All costs of this appeal are assessed to Defendants.

PRESCRIPTION EXCEPTION GRANTED; DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

In re Snavely, 258 So. 3d 52 (La. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

258 So. 3d 52 (In re Snavely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related