In re Snavely

Louisiana Court of Appeal

In re Snavely

258 So. 3d 52

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 13, 2017

Docket17–238

StatusPublished

This text of 258 So. 3d 52 (In re Snavely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Snavely, 258 So. 3d 52 (La. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

SAVOIE, Judge.

*53For the reasons set forth in Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC , 17-237 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/17), 257 So.3d 1264, the exception of prescription filed by Ms. Snavely and J. Lomax Jordan is granted. Defendants' motions seeking attorney fees as sanctions filed in each of the three consolidated matters are dismissed with prejudice. All costs of this appeal are assessed to Defendants.

PRESCRIPTION EXCEPTION GRANTED; DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAVOIE, Judge.

*53For the reasons set forth in Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC , 17-237 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/17), 257 So.3d 1264, the exception of prescription filed by Ms. Snavely and J. Lomax Jordan is granted. Defendants' motions seeking attorney fees as sanctions filed in each of the three consolidated matters are dismissed with prejudice. All costs of this appeal are assessed to Defendants.

PRESCRIPTION EXCEPTION GRANTED; DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 So. 3d 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-snavely-lactapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack