In re Smolen

Appellate Court of Illinois

In re Smolen

286 N.E.2d 588, 6 Ill. App. 3d 806, 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2586

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJuly 10, 1972

DocketNo. 56334

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 286 N.E.2d 588 (In re Smolen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Smolen, 286 N.E.2d 588, 6 Ill. App. 3d 806, 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2586 (Ill. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. JUSTICE RURKE

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from an order appointing Grace De Velasco Administrator of the estate of her deceased grandson, Richard Smolen, Jr. (See Supreme Court Rule 304(b)(1)). The following appears from the record.

Richard Smolen, Sr., the father of the deceased, and Grace De Velasco, the deceased’s maternal grandmother, filed their Petitions for Letters of Administration in the above estate. At the hearing it was learned that Smolen, Sr., (the appellant here) had been convicted of armed robbery in 1952, and released from the penitentiary in 1957. It was also learned that on April 20, 1971, his rights of citizenship were restored by the Governor of Illinois. The trial judge allowed De Velasco’s petition stating that in his opinion, she would make the best administrator for the estate. We find that the court erred in denying Smolen’s petition.

The fact of Smolen s previous conviction does not render him unqualified to act as an administrator in view of the fact that his rights of citizenship were restored by the Governor. (See Ill. Rev. Stat., 1971, ch. 38, sec. 124 — 2(a).) Furthermore, although it has been held that Section 96 of the Probate Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1971, ch. 3, sec. 96) does not confer an absolute right upon those enumerated therein to be appointed administrator, (see In re Estate of Abell, 395 Ill. 337, 70 N.E.2d 252; Estate of Storer v. Storer, 131 Ill.App.2d 1049, 269 N.E.2d 352) in the absence of an adverse interest or hostility, the statutory preferences must be respected. Cf. O’Rear v. Crum, 135 Ill. 294, 25 N.E. 1097, and In re Estate of Wynn, 311 Ill.App. 190, 35 N.E.2d 702.

For the reasons stated, the order appointing Grace De Velasco Administrator of the Estate of Richard Smolen, Jr., is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Order reversed and cause remanded with directions.

GOLDBERG, P. J., and LYONS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. JUSTICE RURKE

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from an order appointing Grace De Velasco Administrator of the estate of her deceased grandson, Richard Smolen, Jr. (See Supreme Court Rule 304(b)(1)). The following appears from the record.

Richard Smolen, Sr., the father of the deceased, and Grace De Velasco, the deceased’s maternal grandmother, filed their Petitions for Letters of Administration in the above estate. At the hearing it was learned that Smolen, Sr., (the appellant here) had been convicted of armed robbery in 1952, and released from the penitentiary in 1957. It was also learned that on April 20, 1971, his rights of citizenship were restored by the Governor of Illinois. The trial judge allowed De Velasco’s petition stating that in his opinion, she would make the best administrator for the estate. We find that the court erred in denying Smolen’s petition.

The fact of Smolen s previous conviction does not render him unqualified to act as an administrator in view of the fact that his rights of citizenship were restored by the Governor. (See Ill. Rev. Stat., 1971, ch. 38, sec. 124 — 2(a).) Furthermore, although it has been held that Section 96 of the Probate Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1971, ch. 3, sec. 96) does not confer an absolute right upon those enumerated therein to be appointed administrator, (see In re Estate of Abell, 395 Ill. 337, 70 N.E.2d 252; Estate of Storer v. Storer, 131 Ill.App.2d 1049, 269 N.E.2d 352) in the absence of an adverse interest or hostility, the statutory preferences must be respected. Cf. O’Rear v. Crum, 135 Ill. 294, 25 N.E. 1097, and In re Estate of Wynn, 311 Ill.App. 190, 35 N.E.2d 702.

For the reasons stated, the order appointing Grace De Velasco Administrator of the Estate of Richard Smolen, Jr., is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Order reversed and cause remanded with directions.

GOLDBERG, P. J., and LYONS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 N.E.2d 588, 6 Ill. App. 3d 806, 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smolen-illappct-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack