In Re: Smith v.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re: Smith v.. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 F. App'x 687
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2007·No. 07-6779·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6779

In Re: RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:00-cr-00007-FPS; 2:04-cv-00050-FPS; 2:06-cv-00088-FPS)

Submitted: July 19, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Allen Smith, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Allen Smith, Jr. petitions for a writ of

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on

his “application for a certificate of appealability.” He seeks an

order from this court directing the district court to act. We find

there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the

mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Smith v., (4th Cir. 2007).

In Re: Smith v. (In Re: Smith v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.