Home/Supreme Court/In re Smith

In re Smith

420 U.S. 922, 95 S. Ct. 1148, 43 L. Ed. 2d 415, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 532
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 18, 1975
DocketNo. 74-657
StatusPublished
Cited by68 cases

This text of 420 U.S. 922 (In re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Smith, 420 U.S. 922, 95 S. Ct. 1148, 43 L. Ed. 2d 415, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 532 (1975).

Opinion

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari and/or mandamus and/or prohibition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. United States
365 F. Supp. 2d 553 (S.D. New York, 2005)
In Re Norbert Majewski in Re Muriel Majewski, Debtors, William J. Leonard, Trustee-Appellant v. St. Rose Dominican Hospital
310 F.3d 653 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Kipp
990 F. Supp. 102 (N.D. New York, 1998)
State Ex Rel. Collins v. Bedell
460 S.E.2d 636 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1995)
Bechtel Construction Co. v. Secretary of Labor
50 F.3d 926 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Robert L. Simon v. Simmons Foods, Inc., Formerly Known as Simmons Industries, Inc., Intervenor, the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
49 F.3d 386 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Guzman
160 F.R.D. 6 (D. Massachusetts, 1995)
Espinoza v. Superior Court
28 Cal. App. 4th 957 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
Neal v. Honeywell, Inc.
826 F. Supp. 266 (N.D. Illinois, 1993)
Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners v. United States Department of Labor and Robert Reich, the Secretary of Labor
992 F.2d 474 (Third Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Green
144 F.R.D. 631 (W.D. New York, 1992)
United States v. Aguirre-Parra
763 F. Supp. 1208 (S.D. New York, 1991)
United States v. Munoz
736 F. Supp. 502 (S.D. New York, 1990)
United States v. Feldman
731 F. Supp. 1189 (S.D. New York, 1990)
United States v. Ruiz
702 F. Supp. 1066 (S.D. New York, 1989)
United States v. Matos-Peralta
691 F. Supp. 780 (S.D. New York, 1988)
United States v. Biaggi
675 F. Supp. 790 (S.D. New York, 1987)
International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. Mine Safety and Health Administration, Kaiser Coal Corporation, Intervenor. International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. Mine Safety and Health Administration, Utah Power & Light Company, Mining Division, Intervenor
823 F.2d 608 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
International Union, United Mine Workers v. Mine Safety & Health Administration
823 F.2d 608 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor on Behalf of Thomas L. Williams v. Peabody Coal Company and Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, Chapman Merrell v. Peabody Coal Company and Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, United Mine Workers of America on Behalf of James Rowe v. Peabody Coal Company, William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, on Behalf of I.B. Acton v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc., and Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, United Mine Workers of America v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc., and Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
822 F.2d 1134 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 U.S. 922, 95 S. Ct. 1148, 43 L. Ed. 2d 415, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-scotus-1975.