Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/In re Smith

In re Smith

419 S.E.2d 843, 309 S.C. 94, 1992 S.C. LEXIS 177
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 301 S.C. 75 →
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 24, 1992·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline petitions this Court to temporarily suspend the respondent from the practice of law. After a hearing in the matter, we have determined that the petition should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this State is temporarily suspended until further order of this Court. Respondent shall, within fifteen (15) days of this order, file an affidavit with the Clerk of this Court showing that he has fully complied with the provisions of Paragraph 30 of Rule 413, SCACR. This order shall be made public as provided by Paragraph 7 B of Rule 413, SCACR.

/s/ Ernest A. Finnev. Jr.. C.J.

/s/Jean H. Toal. A.J.

Is/ James E. Moore. A.J.

Harwell, C.J., and Chandler, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Smith, 419 S.E.2d 843, 309 S.C. 94, 1992 S.C. LEXIS 177 (S.C. 1992).

419 S.E.2d 843 (In re Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.