In re Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Smith

295 S.E.2d 788, 278 S.C. 340, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 478

DecidedOctober 11, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 295 S.E.2d 788 (In re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Smith, 295 S.E.2d 788, 278 S.C. 340, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 478 (S.C. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Pursuant to Section 27 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Respondent Thomas Michael Smith has tendered a consent to disbarment.

The consent to disbarment was reviewed by the Executive Committee of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, and the Commission recommended that respondent be disbarred.

It is, therefore, ordered that Respondent Thomas Michael Smith be permanently disbarred. Pursuant to Section 27(C) of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, we do not detail the facts and circumstances of the incidents giving rise to this complaint. They are well known to the complainant and respondent.

Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in this State and his name shall be stricken [341]*341from the roll of attorneys of this State. Respondent shall, within five (5) days from the date of this Order, deliver his certificate of admission to practice law to the Clerk of this Court for cancellation.

This Order shall be published with the opinions of this Court.

And it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI