In re Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Smith

665 A.2d 464

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 2, 1995

DocketNo. 502, Disciplinary Docket No. 2-Supreme Court; No. 69 DB 85 Disciplinary Board

StatusPublished

This text of 665 A.2d 464 (In re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Smith, 665 A.2d 464 (Pa. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 1995, upon consideration of the Report and Recom[465]*465mendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated August 28, 1995, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

CASTILLE, J., dissents. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 1995, upon consideration of the Report and Recom[465]*465mendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated August 28, 1995, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

CASTILLE, J., dissents. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

665 A.2d 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-pa-1995.