In re Smith

22 F. Cas. 394, 11 Int. Rev. Rec. 78
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 F. Cas. 394 (In re Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Smith, 22 F. Cas. 394, 11 Int. Rev. Rec. 78 (S.D.N.Y. 1870).

Opinion

In the case of the brewery of Mrs. Clarissa Si i th, at Kingston, a verdict was given on the 28” i of February against the claimants, the jury refusing to believe the assertion of the defendant's witnesses, that the “blotter,” extracts from which were introduced by the prosecution, was merely a memorandum book kept by the foreman in the absence of the superintendent, and that the entries in it were faithfully transferred to the book required to be kept by law. On the contrary, they held that the amounts of ale entered in the “blotter” were fraudulently manufactured, and consequently the brewery and contents, appraised at $1,700, were declared forfeited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linton v. Robinson
60 P. 881 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1900)
In re San Gabriel Sanatorium Co.
95 F. 271 (S.D. California, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. Cas. 394, 11 Int. Rev. Rec. 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-smith-nysd-1870.